What should poetry do




















Vacuuming the stairs, watering the lawn, that sort of thing. Thank you for your input Dennis. This is why I put it out there. I wanted to know how and what I can improve on. Again, thank you! I just found your tips practical for the high school students. I happened to write few poems without knowing how to write.. Thank you for all d informations.. It is very well written article and if followed the correct steps as described above. It can help improve the poetry writing skills a lot.

One should pay attention to the following questions. I think a good poet is very good at observing their surroundings. They are able to push these elements of life into creative writing, which can be in the form of poetry. I liked the poem by Sean Francisco in the comments. Poem Spark — Beautiful title.

Wow,wonderful explanations and recommendations of poetry. I am a poet too. In the 3rd book in my Butterflies series, I am writing a 3rd section on poem structure.

Now I have my own idea about how a poem is written and I just had to run a Google search for comparison. I just wrote this poem in maybe 30 minutes, good or bad, you all call it. I like it pretty good, I think.

Its wine warmed in the heart, God given to man. There is just one start, with all the world at your hand. Yes, sing us your song. You can do no wrong. After your gold, gleams light on the dark please always be so bold, you make a Poem Spark.

Would appreciate your expertise here c: Thank you in advance! A people full of sorrows A people full of sufferings A people full of burden A people full of pain A people full of despair A people full of confusion A people full of shame A people full of difficulties A people full of tragedies A people full of nightmares.

A nation full of fools A nation full of slaves A nation full of beggars A nation full of captives. A nation full of cowards A nation full of idiots A nation full of sycophants A nation full of robots.

A nation full of liars A nation full of hypocrites A nation full of clowns A nation full of puppets. A nation full of rascals A nation full of maniacs A nation full of crooks A nation full of monkeys. A nation full of deserters A nation full of bystanders A nation full of profiteers A nation full of racketeers.

A nation full of pretenders A nation full of blusterers A nation full of squanderers A nation full of blunderers. A nation full of deceivers A nation full of invaders A nation full of conspirators A nation full of saboteurs. A nation full of slanderers A nation full of distorters A nation full of captors A nation full of tormentors.

Memorizing such poems gave the ancients a way to share their thoughts far and wide. Interestingly, when writing did emerge, Plato claimed that this new technology was weakening the minds of the young — they could no longer remember simple facts.

Poetry helps us find our inner voice. We all have many ideas milling around in our heads, and a poem is the perfect place to let them run wild. Poetry lets us positively share our feelings. Many of us feel angry, frustrated, sad, or fearful from time to time. However, because these feelings are unpleasant, we often keep them locked up inside of us. Writing and reading poetry help us let these feelings out and also better understand them. Poems like this one have showed me that feeling a little blue is not always such a bad thing and, just as importantly, that when I do, I am not alone.

Poetry, in its very essence, helps people become better individuals. It helps them develop their skills, maximize their creativity, and understand the world around them. You sounded great from the onset to the full stop. I really enjoyed your post. You make so many great points. My favorite point was that the message you want to convey is what is most important.

Also the point that poems do not have to rhyme. I wrote a poem for my girlfriend and she wondered if it was poetry because it did not rhyme. I typically do not rhyme in poems but I do in my songs. Now I am considering rhyming from time to time in my poems to make them feel more poetic. Thank you for the great post. Your email address will not be published. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.

Learn how your comment data is processed. Discover how to write faster—while improving your writing skills—with these easy, instantly actionable tips. They're how I publish 5 books a year while dealing with client work and chronic health issues. If I can do it, so can you. By signing up to our list, you confirm you're over the age of I confirm I'm over 18 and want to join The Writer's Cookbook mailing list.

Read our Scrivener reviews and walkthroughs. Read our Plot Factory review. Read our ProWritingAid review. As Tate's poem goes on, it capitalizes on its own excess, and its tale simultaneously becomes more dreadful. In the past, Tate's subject matter has been the illogic and haplessness of private psychic life.

But in Ghost Soldiers, his narratives suddenly seem social and political--more about our collective disorientation and estrangement as citizens than about the eccentricity of an individual speaker. In "The Rules," the universe seems to be a kind of bizarre police state; the subject of the poem becomes the innumerable unspoken rules which bind us, our tragic willingness to cooperate, and the consequent foreclosure of wonder.

Tate's effectiveness makes an argument for the poetic power of context. His narrative frame may be slight, but it offers the reader a place to stand and the opportunity for identification.

When we read a poem like "The Rules," we see modern vertigo rendered in manners as absurd and forceful as those of "The aircraft rotates" or "please advise stop," but more directly and more movingly.

These vertiginous poems share much in subject matter but have very different timbres. As "The Rules" are enumerated, one after another, we are able to relish the shifts in implication between, for example, the command to "Never ride on a blimp" absurd and "Don't touch strangers" poignant. Tate's poem of disconnecting provokes pity, recognition, and laughter. Here is the end of Tate's vertiginous two-page poem:.

This sobering conclusion feels heartfelt, deflating, and true, in part because it has been formally prepared for. As a longtime reader of Tate, I feel that his genius has reinvented itself once again, this time as an allegorist and satirist, an American Kafka. The Ghost Soldiers is a fat book, containing nearly one hundred poems; not all of them are political. But Tate's picaresque imagination has an unerring knowledge of, and tenderness for, human fallibility; at the same time his recognitions about the pathos of modern life, as borne by idiom, manners, and tone, are pitch-perfect.

In the mode of fantasist parable, there's no better representation than these poems of what it is to be in the middle of America now. Psychological eccentricity is no longer the topic of Tate's narrative melodies, but collective tragedy:. I asked Jasper if he had any ideas about the coming revolution. There might be," I said. You're always trying to fool with me," he said. It's hard to tell which side they're on," I said.

Everyone's against us. Isn't that what you believe? There are a few misguided stragglers who still believe in something or other," I said. It's important to believe in the cause," I said. We have no rights," he said. We fell silent for the next few minutes. I was staring out the window at a rabbit in the yard. Finally, I said, "I was just saying all that to amuse you. What is more tragic, and in this case, less true, than the speaker's disclaimer: "I was just saying all that to amuse you"?

At the end of "Desperate Talk," we feel the absurdity and pathos of human ignorance, and the echoing vacancy of the social landscape. Even so, we are able to breathe inside Tate's poem, and to sense the development of dimensions, sympathies, shades, and transformation, because we are given the gift of context.

With the asset of that third dimension, a narrative frame, the poem makes room for the reader, and gives the reader a chance to respond. Inventive and discursive, quirky and non-linear, she is warmer and more humane than Ashbery, and, for me, more satisfying to read, because she is less intentionally vacant empty-headedness, about half the time, is a strategy for Ashbery. Alternately dipping into the textual and the experiential, sometimes straightforward and sometimes wildly errant, her work doesn't want for speculative intelligence of many kinds--but in Hejinian's writing, one feels the attachment of the speaker.

Though she is dead-set against predictability, her method doesn't feel like a lunge for novelty, or an obedience to an ethic of deconstruction, but like a comfortable, well-worn style of dress. As a consequence, in a Hejinian poem, ideas are shaded and fleshed by experience, and vice versa. Her work is simply more three-dimensional than most poems, conventional or experimental:. It is January 7 or perhaps it's a thank you note.

Instead of creating realities art gives us illusions of illusions--so says Plato and for Plato little could be worse. Would you agree with Plato? B wants to liberate phrases from the structural confines and coercive syntax of sentences and so does C but C is in France.

A sense of the uniqueness and interrelatedness of things is fundamental here. It would be hard to go farther than a mile from home for groceries and the fun of it without noticing the canyon's rosy mouth which is very like the one in Zane Grey's randy landscape.

Hejinian deals in the same contemporary verities as the other poets considered here--unknowability and transience, the illusory nature of selfhood, the limits and instabilities of language--and like them she is quirky and playful, deliberately irregular in her progressions. But Hejinian handles her material in a quasi-discursive, quasi-autobiographical manner, comforting for its intimacy and intermittent physicality.

The Fatalist, though at times intentionally choppy, is nonetheless stubbornly three-dimensional. With her pedigree in deconstruction, Hejinian naturally accounts for language as material, and fractures the rules of predictability in syntax and sentence.

Yet in mapping the human condition, all concepts are not created equal. The effect is to keep us on our toes, and, at the same time, to keep us company. At times I feel that Hejinian, in her generous claims about the spaciousness of human nature, has become the unlikely Wordsworth of her tribe:. Time is filled with beginners. You are right. Now each of them is working on something and it matters.

The large increments of life must not go by unrecognized. That's why my mother's own mother-in-law was often bawdy. Will this work? The long moment is addressed to the material world's "systems and embodiments" for study for sentience and for history. Materiality, after all, is about being a geologist or biologist, bread dough rising while four boys on skateboards attempt to fly.

Hejinian practices a method she calls "free concentration," which tracks the changing presence of consciousness like rings sliding past on the surface of a river.

Elements of randomness and deconstruction are part of the flow, as well as passages of considerable continuity. Thus The Fatalist--as a non-beginning-middle-end kind of project, is not notable for its dramatic arc.

It is written in episode-like paragraphs, which might be described as the journal entries of a playful intellectual. Whimsical, intermittently serious, the density changes, and, admittedly, might be hard to stay with in a cumulative way. And this seems true in general--the experimental poet, almost by principle, chooses improvisation over accumulative dramatic shape.

I suppose that may be part of the "fatalist's" message--process, not product; pulling it all together is not the point, no more than pulling it all apart.

But even though I may not be "getting anywhere," Hejinian rewards me with the contact of a rich, generous, and experienced sensibility. As a reader I feel the united, collaborative commitment of intellect and feelings, idea and material, and the author's ongoing, affectionate meditation about consciousness and its connection to human life.

As a result, there are plenty of passages in The Fatalist which make me happier in the reading--partly because of their diffidence--than most other recent poetry.

Maybe this is esoteric stuff, poetry for the initiated, full of loose ends. But The Fatalist also teaches one how to read it.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000