Whereas ISO defines the audit requirements. ISO establishes requirements. On the other hand, ISO are best practices that are not mandatory.
That means that an organization does not need to comply with ISO but can use it as inspiration to implement requirements in ISO For example, in ISO you have a control that requires the organization to do backups and in ISO you have the same control but more developed, saying that the backups should be done at planned intervals, that should be tested, that you should backup data and software, etc.
ISO is more complex and difficult to comply with but it is not mandatory because depending on the context and the business of the organization it could implement the control in another way. ISO establishes what you have to do but not how. ISO describes how. Control objectives and controls from these tables shall be selected as part of the ISMS process specified in 4.
So you do have to take Annex A controls in scope, be it that you can place them out-of-scope if you can argue why for example no software development takes place, or the risk is too low. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. For example, ISO specifies:. Another key difference is the details.
If they are merged, they can show positive sides of both these standards. A simple answer is usability and applicability. If both these standards were merged, it would have been too complex for practical use. If you want to establish a robust information security framework within your organization, ISO will provide the standards in the form of requirements you need to attain. Such flexibility provides plenty of opportunities to adopt ISO information security controls in a way unique to your organization.
With a passion for technology, Yulia writes about all things digital covering wide ranging topics such as digital marketing, finance and productivity. Contributing to BusinessTechWeekly. ISO vs. ISO - What's the difference? ISO - What's the Difference? An example of this is A. Implementation Guidance When using mobile devices, special care should be taken to ensure that business information is not compromised.
The mobile device policy should consider: a registration of mobile devices; b requirements for physical protection; c restriction for software installation; d requirements for mobile device software versions and for applying patches; e restriction of connection to information services; f access controls; g cryptographic techniques; h malware protection; i remote disabling, erasure or lockout; j backups; k usage of web services and web apps. Where the mobile device policy allows the use of privately owned mobile devices, the policy and related security measures should also consider: a separation of private and business use of the devices, including using software to support such separation and protect business data on a private device; b providing access to business information only after users have signed an end user agreement acknowledging their duties physical protection, software updating etc.
ISO outlines how an organisation can manage their information security. While ISO looks very similar in structure it is designed to supplement the requirements outlined in ISO by outlining best practices for the controls. In full, whilst ISO compliance is commonly discussed, there are a number of other standards in the ISO family, that help provide ISO implementation guidance.
ISO is the most well known of these. To put it another way, ISO is implementation guidance for ISO — it helps organisations consider what they need to put in place to meet the requirements of ISO It is worth reading ISO to see typical ways that a requirement of could be satisfied.
An auditor may well show you the implementation guidance in if discussing how a gap in compliance might be addressed. Key points are:.
0コメント